22 May, 2008 3 Comments (c) Print

May 17, in Khmelnik, initiated by the NGO «Youth Council» and «RIGHT» street was aimed at determining public opinion on the treatment of historical personalities VI Lenin.
After its completion, when its members gathered «prychandallya» to guard them went on the court and said that they zabyralysya. (Very regret that failed to remove all of this on video). After objections, he said that everything happens along with the court, and it is forbidden ... (surprisingly, picket the Constitutional Court - can be as near miskrayonnoho - no ...) The holding action was urgent after the recent «terrorist attack» or «act of vandalism», which occurred just Birthday «leader», when unknown patriots rozmalyuvaly monument. (By the way, the video that could remove conscious citizen who accidentally found himself on «myestye pryestuplyeniya», not quite able to see what was written on the pedestal. According to eyewitnesses managed to establish that the «facade» krasuvavsya monument inscription « Cat Ukraine », behind -« Repressor », and on the sides -« Glory UPA »and« Glory to Ukraine »). So organizers set a goal to seek the views Hmilnychan on historical figures of the «leader», but not his «blidoyi copies» (means the monument).
Members of NGOs involved in conducting the action, relying on a huge «luggage» different slogan and calls the Soviet era, which ryasnily towns and villages (such as «Dahonim and pyeryehonim Amyeriku ... etc.), and taking as the basis of two, probably the most popular ( «Communism - yep sovyetskaya government ETO plus elyektrifikatsiya vsyey countries» and «Party - content, chyest and ... our era», the word «conscience» purpose is not writing, just as it lacked a «party» and still lacks its offspring and followers), decided to call the action «V. I. Lenin is - ... ». That is, of the shares planned to get an answer to the question that they personally are Lenin.
In general, to participate in the promotion and public discussions to acquire more than 100 people. Agreed to express its opinion on the paper and place in the «Stini truth» (thank her awards!) 70 people. The reason for this discrepancy is the reluctance of participants persists. Fantasy in Hmilnychan was not too ...
After reviewing the results of the action, the organizers have received the following results:
- A positive attitude to Illich - 27%;
- Negative attitude - 71%;
- Not identified - 2%.
And proslidkovuvalasya a trend. Citizens under the age of 35 years, mostly expressed a negative attitude to the figures of Lenin (approximately 80%). Aged 35 to 50 - roughly equal, and from 50 and more - only 10% expressed their negative attitude towards the «leader». (Note: results of the study can not be considered final, because not taken into account the sample by age, etc.).
Among «pearls» to «Anniversary» Illich members of the following:
«Lenin - the opiate of the people», «- Lenin mafia of the time», Lenin - the evil genius »,« ... monuments to Lenin needs only to birds to crap on his head ... »,« Lenin = Hitler »,« - Lenin loser (???)», «Lenin - a terrorist», «Lenin - a big misunderstanding», «- Lenin fellow», «Lenin - a good man», «Lenin - the smart and sensible person», Lenin - a positive personality » .
If the behavior of participants, the more loyal as to the subject and to other beliefs were very young people. They have behaved more tolerant to the thoughts of participants in the older generation, while their opponents were themselves sometimes aggressive ...
Action was the culmination of an event that organizers are not planned. Before the campaign, as required by the Constitution of Ukraine, was sent to the mayor about his intention to hold the stock. It was the Board, the decision on the resolution was written (and this is a little later). The most action was carried out on the street Stolyarchuk, opposite the towns and along with the Urban District Court. After its completion, when its members gathered «prychandallya» to guard them went on the court and said that they zabyralysya. (Very regret that failed to remove all of this on video). After objections, he said that everything happens along with the court, and it is forbidden ... (surprisingly, picket the Constitutional Court - can be as near miskrayonnoho - no ...) After the author of these lines overtook guardian (he saw that almost all already donated, went to court) and tried to get an explanation why it (the guard) so decided watchman order stated that he had only just doing their work:
- I use my work ... I pozvonyly ...
- Who pozvonyv? Some of the management?
- I am only doing their work ...
(Very regret that there is no video !!!!!!!)
Now you want to come back to the city government reaction to the message of the campaign. As already mentioned, in the name of the head of «Youth Council» received (or rather it passed) the decision of the Board Hmilnytskoyi city council. With a copy can be read below. Surprising is not only that the decision of the executive - with the seal orhviddilu, and almost not that without signing officer (probably planned Secretary Council), and that the executive is given permission (!) (See document itself) for the shares. Is it legally? Indeed, the Constitution of Ukraine does not get any permits for such events ... A ban may be only the court ... That is, if you have permission, it would in principle not to be? Is lawful actions of city government? I would like to get an answer from experts Podolski Center of Human Rights, and in particular Michael Bardyna ....